Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjiv Kumar, Member (A)
Sujit Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. oa challenges hra recovery orders retrospectively. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. dgqa orders allowed hra without nac until 2008. (Para 4 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. applicants faultless; recovery violates natural justice. (Para 5 , 8) |
| 4. respondents justify phased recovery per sro 31. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. no employee fault; recovery impermissible per rafiq masih. (Para 9 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. oas allowed; impugned orders set aside. (Para 18 , 19) |
ORDER
As the subject matter in all the connected O.As are one and the same and the relief/s sought by the applicants are similar, merely having different dates and events would not in any way disturb the ultimate finding to be given by this Tribunal. Therefore, as requested by the counsel for either sides, all the O.As have been heard together and decided by a common order. For ready reference the facts of the O.A No. 193/2020 are taken.
2. These original applications have been filed under section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act 1985 seeking relief to set aside the Daily Order part -1 No. 20/AD dated 30.01.2020, Daily Order Part-I No. 18/AD-1 dated 31.01.2020 and Daily Order Part-I No. 17/AD dated 31.01.2020 respectively passed by the respond
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
