Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
A. K. Dubey, Member (A), Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)
Chhaganbhai P. Rohit – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. father claims death benefits and daughter's compassionate appointment post son's death. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents deny claims; wife remains legal widow per records. (Para 3) |
| 3. parties argue nomination validity and family disputes. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. rules prioritize wife for gratuity if nomination invalid post-marriage. (Para 6) |
| 5. oa not maintainable; stay vacated; proceedings dismissed. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER
Per: Hon’ble Dr. A. K. Dubey, Member (A)
1. Applicant who is father of a deceased railway servant has filed this OA, seeking following reliefs: -
“8.1 Lord ships be pleased to admit this petition. And be pleased to direct the respondent to consider the claim of the applicant for the death benefit and compassionate appointment to his daughter with all consequential benefit.
8.2 That the Hon’ble tribunal may be kindly pleased to call for the entire record of the applicant in possession of the respondent for its kind perusal.
8.3 any other relief which the Hon’ble tribunal deems fit.
8.4 That the Hon’ble tribunal in the facts and circumstances of the present case may further be pleased to grant cost of the application to the applicant.
2. On 09.11.2022 this tri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
