Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member, Shalini Misra, Administrative Member
B. Bhaskar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's promotion and frequent transfers history. (Para 2) |
| 2. respondents justify transfer on administrative needs. (Para 3 , 4 , 11) |
| 3. applicant argues policy violation and afterthought reasons. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court holds pre-tenure transfers arbitrary without reasons. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. impugned order quashed; oa allowed. (Para 17) |
ORDER
(As per Hon’ble Dr. Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member)
By this OA, the applicant sought the following relief:
“……….to call for the records leading to and connected with the proceedings No.SCR/P-HQ/260/N-10/GAZ/2023 dated 07.06.2023 issued under officer Order No.Gaz/146/2023 by the 2nd respondent to the extent of transferring the applicant from Secunderabad to Mahaboobnagar declare and set aside the same as illegal arbitrary and contrary to transfer policy and consequently direct the respondents to retain the applicant at Hyderabad in any Post as ASTE.
ii) and to pass such other order or orders as deemed fit in the interest of justice.”
2. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant initially recruited as Telecom Maintainer and he earned promotions as Junior Engineer and Section Engineer by w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
