Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjiv Kumar, Member (A)
Khushnavi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of casual engagement and termination claims. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. institution not railway establishment; no regularization eligibility. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. uma devi bars irregular appointment regularization. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. application dismissed; no relief granted. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
ORDER
This original application has been filed under section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act 1985 seeking relief to set aside the order dated 21.01.2015 passed by the respondent no. 6 and to direct the respondents to absorb and regularize the applicant at any suitable post and to pay regular salary.
2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the applicant was appointed as Safai Karmi in the office of respondent no. 5, which is the Semi Government Institution of the Indian Railway, on 06.03.2003. The contention of the applicant is that a Chhan Examination was conducted by the Railway Department through the General Manager and its result was declared on 03.11.2006 in which the Hasth Shilp Kala Centre, Gorakhpur is mentioned at Sl. No. 3. It is further contended that the office of respondent no. 6 through its Secretary issued a letter dated 07.07.2014 seeki
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
