Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Suresh Kumar Batra, Judicial Member, Rashmi Saxena Sahni, Administrative Member
Dinesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. lists parties and cases consolidated (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details service history and restructuring (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. acps entitlements post-sss notification (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. discrimination against seniors in acp grant (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. respondents defend absorption as promotion (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. rejects respondents' arguments and precedents (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. acp regulated by functional grades only (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. grants 2nd acp w.e.f. 12.02.2002 (Para 19 , 20) |
ORDER
PER: RASHMI SAXENA SAHNI, MEMBER (A)
1. All these five original applications were heard together and are being taken up for disposal by a common order, as was requested by learned counsel for the parties. For convenience facts are taken from the case of Dinesh Kumar & Ors. vs. UOI & Ors. (O.A. No.60/275/2019).
2. Present original application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking following relief:-
(b) Respondent’s letter dated 12.06.2017 and dated 13.02.2018 (Annexure A-1 and Annexure A-2) be quashed and set aside being arbitrary, illegal and unjust and discriminatory offending Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India;
(c) Directions may kin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
