Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
S. Sujatha, Judicial Member, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Administrative Member
Chinthagunta Rajamohan Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Senior Office-in-Charge Administration, Head Quarter Training Command, IAF – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. recruitment process, provisional selection, document verification issues. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. jurisdiction upheld for bangalore bench. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. certificates verified genuine except ews validity dispute. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. ews certificate valid per dopt for prior fy. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. direct appointment order within eight weeks. (Para 18 , 19) |
ORDER (ORAL)
PER: RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA, MEMBER (A)
1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:
a) To direct the 3rd Respondent to issue appointment order to the Applicant to the post of Cook (OG) under EWS Category as per provisional appointment order No. AFSTAM/2428/1/CIV ADM dated 27.09.2022 (Annexure A-8) issued by the 3rd Respondent.
b) To pass such other order/s as this Tribunal may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.
2. The facts of the case as pleaded by the applicant in his pleadings, are as follows:
a) The 1st Respondent issued a Notification vide advertisement No. 04/2022/DR for different posts of Ayah/Ward Sahayika, Cook(OG), Housekeeping Staff (HKS) and Civil Mec
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
