SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 8575

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rashidur Rahman – Appellant
Versus
D/o Post – Respondent


ORDER (ORAL)

PER: URMITA DATTA (SEN), MEMBER (J):

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that since the issue involved in this case is identical one, therefore, applicants’ prayer to join together in a single application may be allowed; and is, therefore, allowed.

2. This application has been preferred to seek the following relief:

“8.1 To set aside and quash the impugned merit list dated 07.12.2017 published by the respondent authorities to the extent the private respondent no-7 to 42 are concern (ANNEXURE-A3) and appoint the applicants after following due procedure immediately.

8.2 To direct the official respondent to give all consequential service benefit to the applicants along with all those who have been appointed as per impugned merit list published on

7.12.2019.

8.3 To direct the respondent authorities to take initiative to process criminal proceeding against the persons who have been submitted fake/forged documents to get selected on the basis of the representation submitted by few of the applicants (ANNEXURE-A4).

8.4 Cost of the application.

8.5 Any other relief/ relief’s to which the applicant is entitled to under the facts and circumstances of the case and a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top