Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjiv Kumar, Member (A)
Chhadam – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and temporary status facts. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 2. applicant's arguments citing precedents for regularization. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. court reviews precedents on pension for temporary employees. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. temporary status employees entitled to pension despite no regularization. (Para 9 , 12) |
| 5. oa allowed with pension and retiral benefits plus 6% interest. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
ORDER
By way of the present original application filed under section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act 1985 the applicant has prayed for quashing the order dated 11.02.2022 and for a direction to the respondents to treat him deemed regularized MTS at par with his junior and grant him consequential benefits of such regularization including payment of pension and other retiral benefits. Prayer has also been made to direct the respondents to pay amount of gratuity, leave encashment and pension to the applicant from the date of his retirement including arrears of pension with 12% interest .
2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the applicant, who was initially recruited as casual labour through the Employment Exchange, Varanasi and joined the service on 17.03.1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
