Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Suresh Kumar Batra, Judicial Member
Ram Chander Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. retired audit officer seeks quashing of orders denying pension revision. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. reliance on supreme court judgment; continuous cause of action claimed. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. oms limit benefits to post-01.04.1987 retirees; applicant ineligible. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. distinction reasonable under article 14; oa dismissed. (Para 13 , 14 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
ORDER(Oral)
Per: SURESH KUMAR BATRA, MEMBER (J):
1. The applicant has filed instant O.A under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking following relief:
“(i) the impugned orders/communications dated 14.09.2020 Annexure A-1 along with communication dated 27.8.2020 Annexure A-2, order/communication dated 17.03.2020 Annexure A-3 along with communication dated 4.3.2020 Annexure A-4 may kindly be quashed, in the interest of justice.
(ii) the part of the letter dated 24.6.1993/21.6.1993 Annexure A-5 (Colly) limiting the pensionary benefits to the Audit Officers retired between 1.4.1987 to 31.3.1992 and non-providing the benefits to the applicant-Audit officer retired on 1.1.1987 forenoon by making in-classification between the class of Pensioners may a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
