Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
S. Sujatha, Judicial Member, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Administrative Member
P. Alwin Chacko – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges discharge orders post-probation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. vigilance inquiries reveal recruitment irregularities. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. probation held pending tainted selection inquiry. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. discharge upheld; oa dismissed without costs. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
ORDER (ORAL)
PER: RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA, MEMBER (A)
1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:
a) To quash and set aside the impugned discharge Order No. P/1/7/16/2022-23/2016 dated 02.02.2023 (Annexure A1) passed by the 3rd Respondent vide which the applicant has been discharged from the services of the council with immediate effect.
b) To quash and set aside the impugned discharge Order No. ROHCS/2864/22-23/1261 dated 06.02.2023 (Annexure A2) passed by 4th Respondent vide which the applicant has been relieved from the duties of Regional Occupational Health Centre with immediate effect.
c) To issue a consequential direction to the Respondents No.2 and 3 to reinstate the applicant to his original post forthwith with continuity of service, back wages from the date of discharge i.e., 06.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
