SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 8725

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
B Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Nuclear Fuel Complex – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

(As per Hon’ble Dr. Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member)

Heard Mr. R Mahanty, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. A Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. By this Original Application the applicant is seeking the following relief(s):

“to direct the Respondents to grant one annual increment which the applicant had earned one day prior to retired, on attaining the age of superannuation i. e 30.06.2016 in the light of the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment in R.P. (C) No.1731/2019 in SLP (C) No.22008/2018 duly declaring the action of the authorities in not considering the same as illegal, arbitrary and against to the principles of natural justice and also against to denying the same is unjust, arbitrary and discriminatory, and against to the Article 141 & 142 and Art. 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and oblige.”

3. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for applicant submits that, as per the relief prayed for by the applicant, the issue is no more res-integra and is fully covered by the judgement of the Hon’ble

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top