SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 8760

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Prabhat Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Staff Selection Commission (ssc) – Respondent


ORDER (ORAL)

Hon’ble Mrs. Pratima K. Gupta, Member (J)

At the outset, Ms. Neha Bairagee with Mr. Jagdish N., who has appeared on behalf of the SSC, states that in view of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between SSC and Delhi police, the instant OA would be defended by the counsel representing Delhi Police. Accordingly, learned counsel for Respondents No. 3, Mr.Amit Yadav, shall represent Respondent No. 1 and 2 as well.

2. Factual matrix, as explained by the learned counsel for the applicant, is that the applicant has participated in the recruitment process initiated by the SSC, for the post of Constable (Executive) Male and Female in Delhi Police Examination, 2023. After having been successfully cleared the said examination, name of the applicant appeared in the list of provisionally selected candidates. Thereafter he was called for medical examination which was conducted by the Medical Board, and reviewed by a subsequent Medical Board, wherein the applicant has been declared unfit for the medical condition as opined at page 19 annexure A1.

3. Aggrieved by the same, the applicant has preferred the instant Original Application seeking the following relief(s) :-

“(a) quash a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top