Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
S. Sujatha, Judicial Member, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Administrative Member
Lakshmi Sowjanya Bammidi – Appellant
Versus
Director, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's challenge to recruitment notifications for assistant professor post. (Para 1) |
| 2. alleged irregularities in 2018 selection process and re-advertisements. (Para 2) |
| 3. selection based on interview performance; no obligation to notify unsuccessful. (Para 3) |
| 4. applicant's consistent non-selection due to low interview scores. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. oa dismissed for lack of merit. (Para 15) |
| 6. mandate public declaration of selection results for transparency. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. oa disposed with directions; no costs. (Para 22 , 23) |
ORDER (ORAL)
PER: RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA, MEMBER (A)
1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:
a) To quash the Impugned Notification bearing No. NIMH/PER(6)/RECT/ADVT-3/Fac/2018-19 dated 12.11.2018 issued by the 1st Respondent (Annexure-A9) in so far as it relates to inviting applications for filling up the post of Assistant Professor of Human Genetics in the 1st Respondent NIMHANS.
b) To quash the Impugned Notification bearing No. NIMH/PER(6)/ RECT/ADVT-3/FAC/2022-23 dated 13.12.2022 (Annexu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
