SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 9214

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mahendra Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Air Force Station – Respondent


O R D E R

By Hon’ble Mr. Mohan Pyare, Member (Administrative):

Shri Mohd. Wasim, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Raj Pal Singh, learned counsel for the respondents are present.

2. By means of this OA, the applicant has sought the following reliefs :

(i) Set aside the order dated 02.11.2020 passed by the respondents concerned.

(ii) Direct the respondent No.4 to consider the appointment of the applicant under the Dying in Harness Rules on compassionate ground in the light of O.M. issued by the Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence letter No.19(4)2015/D(Lab dt. 30.04.2015 till the financial distress of dependents of permanent Govt. employees.

(iii) Pass any other order or direction as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case.

(iv) Award cost of the application to the applicant.”

3. The brief facts of the case are that father of the applicant namely Sri Niranjan Singh Yadav was a permanent employee of Air Force Station, Bareilly and died on 17.11.2006. On 21.05.2007, the mother of the applicant moved an application before the respondents for providing compassionate appointment to the applicant in place of her deceased husband. In response to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top