SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 9286

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
AJAY PRATAP SINGH, J, SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, A
Umesh Kumar, Ranjan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India through the General Manager, East Central Railway – Respondent
O.A. No. 050/00312/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri M.P. Dixit
For the Respondents: Shri M.D. Dwivedi, Additional Standing Counsel

Employment promotions in public service must adhere strictly to statutory regulations, and errors in prior promotions can be corrected through due process.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Promotion and eligibility criteria - The applicants challenged their reversion from Lab Superintendent Grade III to original posts as Lab Assistants. The Tribunal upheld the reversion order dated 02.09.2020, stating that the applicants were ineligible for promotion as they did not meet the requisite service requirements under applicable rules and notifications (Para 7.1 of Master Circular No. 31, Rule 165 of IREM). (Paras 22, 44)

(B) Employment and public service law - Mistakes in promotion - The principle established that erroneous promotions can be corrected by the employer following due process; hence, the respondents were justified in reverting the applicants after acknowledging the administrative error in the promotion process. (Paras 32, 41)

Facts of the case:
The applicants were promoted to Lab Superintendent Grade III but were not eligible as they did not have the required two years of service in the immediate lower grade, which is mandated by the Railway Board’s rules and regulations. (Paras 26, 39)

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found the order of reversion lawful, affirming the necessity for adherence to proper eligibility criteria for promotions within the railways, particularly under the statutory rules in IREM. (Paras 44, 45)

Issues: The critical questions were the legitimacy of the reversion and whether the applicants could claim eligibility for promotion despite the administrative error in the previous notification. (Para 22)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that procedural adherence under statutory regulations is paramount, and any mistakes in promotions must be rectified according to established guidelines. (Paras 32, 41)

Result: Original application dismissed; applicants reverted to their original positions.

Table of Content
1. parties involved in the application (Para 1 , 2)
2. overview of promotion process for applicants (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. response from applicants against show cause notice (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. arguments for applicants' promotion eligibility (Para 12 , 14)
5. counterarguments from respondents regarding promotion (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
6. court's consideration of facts and eligibility (Para 19 , 20)
7. identification of legal issues for consideration (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
8. examination of relevant statutory provisions (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
9. mistakes in promotions and their rectification (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
10. final ruling on the applicants' eligibility under rules (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)
11. conclusion and order of the court (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)

ORDER

AS PER:- AJAY PRATAP SINGH, MEMBER[JUDICIAL]

1. The present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals, Act 1985 to set-aside impugned order dated 02.09.2020, whereby applicants have been reverted from the promotional post of Laboratory Superintendent Grade III, Grade-Pay Rs. 4200/-, Level-6 and also set-aside show cause notice dated 14.08.2020 and upheld promotion order dated 16.12.2019 in terms of notification dated 15.02.2019 with all consequential benefits.

PRAYER

2. The applicants have claimed following the main reliefs (as extracted from the OA) as under:-

“8.1 That your Lordships may graciously be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned Order of Reversion dated 02.09.2020 as contained in Annexure- A/11 issued by the Respondent No.2 including show cause Notice dated 14.08.2020 as contained in Annexure A/9 Series.

8.2 That your Lordships may further be pleased to direct command the Respondents to treat the promotion of the Applicants including Annexure-A/7 as just and valid and requires no interference in terms of the condition laid down in the Notification dated 15.02.2019 as contained in Annexure A/1.

8.3 That your Lordships may graciously be pleased to direct / command the Respondents to grant all consequential benefits in favour of the Applicants.

8.4 Any other relief or reliefs including the cost of the proceeding may be allowed in favour of the Applicants.”

FACTS IN BRIEF

3. Briefly stated, the facts, as adumbrated by the applicants in the Original Application that applicant no.1 while working as Lab Assistant Grade-II, Grade-Pay Rs. 2000, Level-3 and the applicant no.2 as Lab Assistant Grade-I Grade Pay Rs. 2400/-, Level-4. The respondent no.2 issued Notification dated 15.02.2019 for selection for promotion to the post of Lab Superintendent Grade-III, GP 4200, Level-6 in terms of Railway Board, RBE No. 225/2001 dated 12.11.2001 and RBE No. 161/2009 dated 03.09.2009 to fill up 6 posts with condition under notification dated 15.02.2009 that serving staff in medical department fulfilled qualification as prescribed for direct recruitment. The applicants possessed qualification prescribed for the direct recruitment hence shown in the list of eligibility published on 22.04.2019. The written examination was held on 09.07.2019 and only present applicants declared successful with 60% required marks. The final panel dated 13.11.2019 published and promotion order dated 16.12.2019 issued for appointment on the selection post of Lab Superintend, grade-III, Grade-Pay 4200/-, Level-6.

4. The further case of applicants that show cause notice dated 14.08.2000 issued to explain why not to revert to them as selection is contravention to Para 7.1 of Master Circular No.31 (also of Para 215 (a) of IREM-I). The applicants made averments and filed reply that promotion to the post of Lab Superintendent, Grade III, Grade-Pay Rs.4200 is accordance with Railway Board orders and conditions of notifications are binding on the parties as selection has been finalized. The respondents no.2 issued impugned order dated 02.09.2020, whereby the applicants ordered for reversion from the posts of Lab Superintendent Grade-III, Gr




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top