Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. K. V. Eapen, Mr. Sunil Thomas, JJ
Vineetha P.R – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility for promotion under ph and obc categories (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. claims and implications of delayed appointments (Para 3 , 7) |
| 3. procedural justification and delays in selections (Para 6 , 10 , 12 , 17 , 29) |
| 4. judicial direction on reservation in promotion (Para 8 , 11 , 26 , 28) |
| 5. final decisions on promotions and representation (Para 18 , 20 , 21 , 30) |
ORDER
Mr. K.V. Eapen, Administrative Member
These OAs have been filed by the same applicant and are taken up for consideration together. However, we are not delivering a common order in these OAs but passing them separately as the order in the OA No.746/2016 has implications for the OA No.285/2019.
OA No.746/2016:-
The applicant, a Gramin Dak Sevak (GDS), had filed this OA on 29.08.2016, aggrieved by an order at Annexure A-1 passed by the 4th respondent, the Postmaster General (PMG), Central Region (CR), Kochi, turning down a representation submitted by her. The order rejected the representation dated 19.01.2016, produced at Annexure A-12, by which, she had requested for a notional promotion with effect from 01.12.2014, like others who had appeared in the Select List for appointment as Postman. She pointed
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
