Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Tarun Shridhar, Member (A), Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member(J)
Ajay – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's selection and medical unfitness dispute. (Para 1 , 8) |
| 2. conflicting medical opinions warrant re-examination. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. rules limit appeals and external certificates. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. direct fresh independent medical exam for fairness. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. TarunShridhar, Member (A)
The applicant participated in the selection process for the post of constable executive in Delhi Police. However, despite her selection she has not been given the offer of appointment as the medical examination followed by the Review Medical Examination has declared her unfit on account of defective distant vision. The applicant ventilates her grievance in the present OA seeking the following relief:
To set aside the medical report dated 21.1.2024 (copy never supplied, thus not annexed) and Review Medical examination report dated 23.1.2024 whereby the applicant was declared medically ’unfit’ and to further direct the respondents that the applicant be subjected to a fresh medical examination in any recognized / reputed hospital of the government in NCR at the earliest and if found fit then to appoint the applicant to the post of Constable(Exe) Male in present
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
