SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 9788

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Smt Munni Devi – Appellant
Versus
M/o Defence – Respondent


ORDER

Hon’ble Dr. Amit Sahai, Member (A)

1. Being aggrieved by the inaction of the respondent department for not granting family pension and other retiral benefits pertaining to late Indra Ram @ Inder Singh along with interest to the applicants and to restrain the respondents from granting any benefits in favour of private respondent no. 4, they have approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

2. The facts necessary to adjudicate the instant OA are as under :-

2.1 The husband of the applicant No. 1 & father of the applicant no. 2 to 4, late Indra Ram @ Inder Singh was working on the post of Mate, in the office of respondent No. 2 and while still in service, expired on 24.01.2015, due to serious illness at Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Jodhpur, leaving behind a wife, the applicant No. 1 and three children (the applicant No. 2 to 4). A Service Certificate (Annexure A/1), a pay slip issued to the deceased (Annexure A/2) and his permanent pass/ ID (Annexure A/3), issued by the respondent department establishes that he was regular employee of the office of respondent no. 3.

2.2 As per the averment made by the applicants, earlier the deceased was married to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top