Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta Sen, Judicial Member, Sumeet Jerath, Administrative Member
Dipen Kumar Hazarika – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants seek macp financial upgradation benefits (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. applicants rely on cat principal bench 2015 judgment (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondents contest binding precedent of in limine dismissal (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. macp allowable in lieu of tbop despite clause 13 (Para 10) |
ORDER(ORAL)
PER URMITA DATTA (SEN), MEMBER (J):
This matter has been taken up by the Circuit Court at Kohima (Nagaland).
2. This petition has been filed by the applicants seeking for the following reliefs: -
“8.1 That the Hon’ble Tribunal be pleased to direct the respondents to grant to the applicants the benefits of financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in terms of the judgment and order dated 26.10.2015 passed by the Hon’ble CAT, Principal Bench, and also in the light of the Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence, letter bearing No. 3(5)/2020-D(AF) dated 03.03.2021, in the Grade Pay of Rs. 4200, Rs. 4600 and Rs. 4800 on completion of 10, 20 and 30 years of regular service under the MACP scheme as early as possible, by way of re-fixing pay of the individual applicant and also re-fix the pay and pensionary benefit to the retired applicants, who have already retired on superannuation from
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
