SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 9888

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shalini Misra, Administrative Member
Tatipudi Annapurnamma @ Ramalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
OA



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Venkanna
For the Respondents: Mr.V.Venu Madhav Swamy, Sr. PC for CG

Family pension to widowed daughter denied due to failure to prove relationship and dependency through consistent documents amid name discrepancies; ex-parte decree not binding; claim barred by limitation and non-joinder.

Headnote:(A) Railway Pension Rules - Family Pension - Eligibility of widowed daughter - Secondary family pension admissible to widowed/divorced daughters beyond 25 years subject to proof of dependency, relationship with deceased pensioner, income criteria, and no prior eligible claimants (RBE No.116/2007, RBE No.99/2013) - Applicant must establish identity, marital status, dependency through authentic documents like death certificates, family composition, non-employment certificates; discrepancies in names across documents (school records, death certificate, pension papers) fatal to claim (Paras 2, 7, 14, 20).

(B) Administrative Tribunal Proceedings - Non-joinder of necessary party (Union of India rep. by General Manager), limitation (cause arose on pensioner’s retirement/death, suit filed years later), delay/latches, prematurity (pending civil proceedings to set aside ex-parte decree) render application not maintainable (Paras 8, 11, 22).

(C) Evidence - Ex-parte civil decree declaring dependency not binding if obtained by suppressing facts, without impleading relevant department, amid name discrepancies; school certificate with added 'alias' name post-denial lacks genuineness; failure to prove income below threshold or fool-proof relationship (Paras 21, 22).

Facts of the case:
Widowed daughter of retired railway employee (superannuated 2003, died 2013) claimed secondary family pension post-husband’s death (2011), alleging dependency on mother. Submitted documents with name mismatches (e.g., school cert as maiden name vs. married name; pensioner’s name/death cert variations). Obtained ex-parte civil decree (2019) naming only one respondent; railways moved to set aside. Tribunal filed 2022.

Findings of Court:
Applicant failed to produce supporting documents proving relationship, identity, dependency, income; documents inconsistent; claim barred by limitation/non-joinder; ex-parte order not conclusive.

Issues: Proof of relationship/dependency via discrepant documents; validity of ex-parte decree; applicability of family pension rules to widowed daughter becoming dependent post-retirement; limitation/prematurity.

Ratio Decidendi: Family pension requires strict documentary proof of eligibility at pensioner’s death; name discrepancies, added 'alias', absent income proof defeat claim; tribunal dismisses for lack of merit, upholding procedural bars (Paras 22-24).

Result: OA dismissed being devoid of merits. No order as to costs.

Table of Content
1. applicant's claim and documentation discrepancies for family pension (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 12 , 13 , 14)
2. family pension eligibility rules for widowed daughters (Para 7)
3. respondents' objections on non-joinder, limitation, and proof (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 15 , 16)
4. court analysis of dependency, documents, and eligibility failure (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. dismissal due to lack of merits (Para 24)

ORDER

PER HON‟BLE MRS. SHALINI MISRA, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER

The applicant has filed this OA seeking the following relief:

“To direct the respondents to grant and release the family pension to the applicant being only eligible person to get secondary family pension as she is fully dependant on her mother and pay all the arrears of family pension to the applicant from the date of death of her mother in the interest of justice and be pleased to pass such other order or orders as this Hon‟ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

2. The brief facts of the case, according to the applicant, are that her mother late S.Sannayamma got superannuated on 31.07.2003 and was given PPO No.59041111482 SPL Track woman/SSE/PWAY/N/O/BZA. While her mother was alive, her husband Sri T.Adinarayana died on 20.06.2011,and therefore for her livelihood, she came to her parental home and was living with her mother.

3. The applicant has submitted that her mother being retired pensioner, died on 15.12.2013. She made an application to the respondents on 18.08.2014 for grant of family pension for which a reply vide letter no.B/P 500/SEP/ 430/T.Annapurnamma, dated 17.09.2014, was received wherein she was advised to submit the following documents:

“(i) Death certificate of the Pension/Family Pensioner;

(ii) Certificate of age showing your date of birth. The certificate should be from Municipal authorities or local Panchayat or from the head of a recognised school, where you have studied or any other document that establishes the relationship of the claimant with the deceased employee/pensioner and contains your date of birth.

(iii) A certificate from Revenue authorities showing family composition of the ex-employee, including the names of those deceased if any with their marital status, age etc.

(iv) Any document showing your earnings, earned through employment in private/public sectors or self employment, your financial status, possession of movable/immovable assets etc.

(v) A declaration by way of an affidavit that there are no other surviving members who may have prior entitlement for family pension, available. For this purpose documents such as marriage/death/income certificates of the other family members which may be essential in a given situation can be submitted.

(vi) Certificate of non-employment and non-remarriage certificate which are self signed and attested by a Gazetted officer with photo identification.

(vii) Marriage certificate, or any other document in proof of your marital status and death certificate of your husband.”

In pursuance of the above directions of the respondents, she had applied for dependent certificate from the competent authority and the Tahsildar, Vijayawada Urban, issued the dependent certificate dated 10.12.2014, wherein she was shown as the daughter of Smt.S.Sannayamma, who died on 15.12.2013, and her two children namely S.Chinna Rao and S.Satyarao, were also expired and the following are the surviving members of the deceased family:

1. S.Tata Rao, son, 58 years;

2. Smt.T.Annapurnamma, w/o late Adinarayana, daughter, age 53 years and widow;

3. S.Gurumurty, son, 45 years;

4. Smt.Alampally Durga, daughter, 40 years, married;

It is also stated in the said letter that all the above persons were married, and the persons at Serial nos.1, 3 and 4 are residing with their marital families and the person at Serial No.2 Smt.Tatipudi Annapurnamma after the death of her husband Sri Tatipudi Adinarayana on 20.6.2011, took shelter of her mother, and she is an unemployee, income less and d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top