SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 10196

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
D.S.MAHRA, Judicial Member, PRASANT KUMAR, Administrative Member
Farooq Ahmad Bhat – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir – Respondent
O.A.NO.: 336 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Altaf Haqani, Sr. Adv.
For the Respondents: Shri Bikram Deep Singh, DAG.

For direct recruits via common exam to district posts but with delayed appointments, combined seniority for divisional promotions fixed by merit position under Rule 24(1)(b), not length of service, where Decentralization Rules are silent on inter-district ordering.

Headnote:(A) J&K Civil Services (Decentralization and Recruitment) Rules, 2010 - Rules 18, 19, 20, 22 - J&K Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 - Rule 24(1) proviso (b) - Seniority of direct recruits to district cadre posts selected through single advertisement, common examination and merit list, but appointed on varying dates across districts for promotion to divisional cadre posts - Where Decentralization Rules require separate district-wise seniority lists but are silent on inter-district seniority for promotions to higher divisional cadre, Rule 24(1)(b) applies mandating seniority based on merit position in competitive examination, not length of service due to administrative delays in appointments - Combined seniority list across districts upheld as it does not breach intra-district merit order and aligns with administrative needs of divisional cadre promotions. (Paras 9, 10, 17, 18)

(B) Service Law - Promotions from district to divisional cadre - Merit-based combined seniority preferred over length of service where recruits from common selection process cannot be penalized for delayed appointment orders attributable to administrative reasons - District-wise promotions would defeat divisional cadre concept, hinder supervisory roles and experience sharing across districts. (Paras 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
Applicants, appointed as forest guards to district cadre posts via single advertisement and common merit list but with varying appointment dates, challenged combined seniority list based on overall merit for promotions to divisional cadre posts of deputy foresters, seeking quashing thereof and district-wise seniority based on length of service under Decentralization Rules.

Findings of Court:
Combined seniority list prepared on basis of merit in common examination is valid; Decentralization Rules do not override specific seniority provisions under Classification Rules for direct recruits; no merit in challenge to list or promotions thereunder.

Issues: (i) Whether seniority for district cadre posts promoting to divisional cadre to be district-wise based on length of service or combined based on common merit; (ii) Applicability of Decentralization Rules vis-à-vis Classification Rules for inter-se seniority determination.

Ratio Decidendi: When specific rules exist under Rule 24(1)(b) for direct recruits' seniority by merit position, length of service cannot supersede; administrative delays in appointments do not alter merit-based order; combined list ensures equity for common selectees and practical divisional cadre functioning.

Result: Original Application dismissed. No costs. Interim orders vacated. (Para 19)

Table of Content
1. challenge to combined seniority list for forest guards promotions (Para 1 , 2)
2. official respondents defend combined merit-based seniority (Para 3)
3. private respondents support merit-based combined list (Para 4)
4. undisputed common selection; key issues framed (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. merit prevails over delayed appointments for seniority (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
6. rule 24(1)(b) cca rules governs inter-se seniority (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
7. oa dismissed upholding combined merit seniority (Para 18 , 19)

ORDER 

Per Hon’ble Mr. Prasant Kumar, Member (A) :-

By virtue of this OA the applicants have challenged the common seniority list of Forest Guards issued by official respondents and pray for promotions to the post of Dy. Foresters in their respective district cadre posts strictly in terms of Rule-22 of Decentralization and Recruitment Rules, 2010.

2. Accordingly, the applicants have prayed for the following reliefs:-

“(i) Call for the records of the non-applicants;

(ii) Quash and set-aside the impugned combined seniority list dated 22.02.2022 (should be 22.02.2023) Annexure-A1, the consideration order - Annexure-A2 and the circular dated 23.02.2023- Annexure-A3.

(iii) Direct the non-applicants to notify the seniority of the applicants and the non-applicants in their respective district cadre posts strictly in terms of Rule-22 of Decentralization and Recruitment Rules, 2010 and that in the event of settlement of combined seniority for affecting promotion to the Divisional Cadre posts of Dy. Foresters, strictly adhere and follow the principle of length of continuous service, based on the date of first substantive appointment (i.e. date of entry/date of membership) in the posts of Forest Guards.

(iv) Prohibit the non-applicants from acting upon the impugned combined seniority list – Annexure- A1/Circular-Annexure-A3.

(v) Pass any other order or direction which the Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the applicants and against the non-applicants.

3. Interim relief prayed for by the applicants include direction to the non-applicants not to accord any consideration for promotion to the posts of Deputy Foresters based on the impugned combined seniority list, pending disposal of the instant OA.

4. Case of the applicants, in a nutshell, is as under:-

4.1 In pursuance of an advertisement, bearing no. 01 of 2011 notified by the JKSSRB, inviting applications for filling up the district cadre posts of Forest Guards in the pay scale of Rs. 5200- 20200, the applicants herein applied for the same and on being selected were offered orders of appointment. According to the applicants, separate notifications of selection were issued in favour of the candidates selected against the posts available in their respective districts where-after the respondents issued orders of appointment of the Forest Guards for various districts of Kashmir Division based on the merit obtained by the appointees in their respective districts during the selection process.

4.2 For giving promotion to the posts of Dy. Foresters in the Divisional Cadre, the respondent department have issued series of combined seniority lists of the Forest Guards borne on district cadres of all the ten districts in Kashmir Division from time to time, including combined seniority list dated 18.12.2021 and 22.02.2022 (should be 22.02.2023) (Annexure-A1).

2.3 The combined seniority list dated 18.12.2021 was challenged by some applicants before this Tribunal through OA No. 32 of 2022, wherein by virtue of order dated 19.01.2022, respondents by way of interim measure, were directed to consider the representation. The applicants therein filed the Contempt Petition for non compliance. Thereafter the respondent department have passed the consideration order dated 04.04.2022 showing substantial compliance. In pursuance thereof, the Contempt Petition was closed and the notices issued to respondents were discharged. Sim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top