Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K Haripal, Judicial Member
Kumari S – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's casual labour service and delayed regularisation history. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 11) |
| 2. parties' contentions on age, limitation, pension schemes. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. limited antedating for pension eligibility only. (Para 7 , 8 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. rejection of limitation plea due to respondents' delays. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. reckonability of minority service per inder pal parameters. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
ORDER
Applicant, at the time of filing the Original Application, was a Track Maintainer-II in Trivandrum division of the Southern Railway. She has since retired from service on superannuation on 31.05.2023. Earlier, the applicant was a casual labourer having 481.5 days service and considering her eligibility for regularisation her name was included in the live register maintained by the Trivandrum division. Her serial number in the register was 2244. She was called for regularisation and screening; she appeared before the authorities, but was not absorbed and that made her to approach this Tribunal with O.A.766/2004. Then as directed by the Tribunal on 07.03.2006 she was absorbed on 23.08.2006, as evident from Annexure-A1. The grievance of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
