CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Kumari S – Appellant
Versus
Southern Railway – Respondent
ORDER
Applicant, at the time of filing the Original Application, was a Track Maintainer-II in Trivandrum division of the Southern Railway. She has since retired from service on superannuation on 31.05.2023. Earlier, the applicant was a casual labourer having 481.5 days service and considering her eligibility for regularisation her name was included in the live register maintained by the Trivandrum division. Her serial number in the register was 2244. She was called for regularisation and screening; she appeared before the authorities, but was not absorbed and that made her to approach this Tribunal with O.A.766/2004. Then as directed by the Tribunal on 07.03.2006 she was absorbed on 23.08.2006, as evident from Annexure-A1. The grievance of the applicant is that even though similarly placed employees who were regularised on subsequent point of time whose date of absorption was antedated at the intervention of this Tribunal, same treatment was not granted to her. She also sought such a relief from the respondents but that was not considered. She had given a representation on 22.04.2022, but it has not yet been considered and that made her to approach this Tribunal to seek declaration
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.