SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 10433

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Kumari S – Appellant
Versus
Southern Railway – Respondent


ORDER

Applicant, at the time of filing the Original Application, was a Track Maintainer-II in Trivandrum division of the Southern Railway. She has since retired from service on superannuation on 31.05.2023. Earlier, the applicant was a casual labourer having 481.5 days service and considering her eligibility for regularisation her name was included in the live register maintained by the Trivandrum division. Her serial number in the register was 2244. She was called for regularisation and screening; she appeared before the authorities, but was not absorbed and that made her to approach this Tribunal with O.A.766/2004. Then as directed by the Tribunal on 07.03.2006 she was absorbed on 23.08.2006, as evident from Annexure-A1. The grievance of the applicant is that even though similarly placed employees who were regularised on subsequent point of time whose date of absorption was antedated at the intervention of this Tribunal, same treatment was not granted to her. She also sought such a relief from the respondents but that was not considered. She had given a representation on 22.04.2022, but it has not yet been considered and that made her to approach this Tribunal to seek declaration

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top