Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ajay Pratap Singh, J
Shiojee Singh – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to pension denial. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of employment. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. applicant's arguments for pension. (Para 5) |
| 4. respondents' counterarguments. (Para 6) |
| 5. determining eligibility for pension. (Para 8) |
| 6. analysis of relevant law. (Para 9) |
| 7. application of departmental policies. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 8. rights accrued to temporary employees. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 9. conclusion on pension eligibility. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 10. decision and directions for compliance. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
ORDER
AS PER : AJAY PRATAP SINGH, MEMBER [JUDICIAL]
1. By way of present Original Application filed under section 19 of Administrative Tribunal, Act 1985 challenging order dated 27.07.2022 whereby respondent No.6 has rejected representation dated 11.10.2021 stating that applicant retired as Temporary Status official without regularization and at the time of his promotion, he refused to be promoted in sanctioned Group ‘D’ post and had not joined as regular Group ‘D’ post at least for one day, his status at the time of retirement was Temporary and not entitled for pension under
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
