SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 10677

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K P Muralidharan – Appellant
Versus
M/o Finance – Respondent


ORDER

(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)

Challenging the impugned order, dated 09.05.2019, of recovery for an amount of Rs.5.41 lakhs, consequent to refixation of his pay in terms of the clarification issued by the Ministry of Finance that NFSG granted w.e.f. 01.01.2016 will be counted as one financial upgradation for MACP Scheme, the applicant has filed the OA.

2. The facts leading to the filing of the OA, are as follows:

The applicant currently serves as Assistant Commissioner of Customs in the office of the 3rd respondent. He began his career with the Central Excise Department in 1982 as an Inspector (ordinary grade) after passing the Staff Selection Commission Examination in 1980. Initially posted at the Central Excise Collectorate in Indore, he subsequently served in the Raipur Division. His career progressed through various postings in Madhya Pradesh until July 16, 1999, when he was confirmed after a probationary period. Under Establishment Order No. 51/1999, dated 14.12.1999, he received his first financial upgradation as Superintendent of Central Excise. Following this, he was deputed to the Enforcement Directorate in Chennai, where his pay was fixed on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top