Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, Member-J, Mohan Pyare, Member-A
Mahendra Kumar Pal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. recruitment process and applicant's success until result withholding (Para 2) |
| 2. respondents' claim of omr tampering during verification (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. applicant's argument against tampering post-computer evaluation (Para 7) |
| 4. respondents defend erasure violation of omr instructions (Para 8) |
| 5. precedents: multiple answers deduct marks, not disqualify (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. no tampering; manual re-evaluation illegal after computer scan (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. quash rejection; direct appointment with supernumerary vacancy (Para 16) |
ORDER
Per Justice Om Prakash VII, Member-J
By means of this Original Application (OA), the applicant has sought the following relief(s):-
“(a) To issue an order or direction in the suitable nature directing the respondents to declare the result of the applicant under the OBC category and then provide him an appointment against the vacancies which notified under the Employment Notice No. 01/2010 dated 19.12.2010 alongwith all consequential benefits within specified period, which may be fixed by this Hon’ble Tribunal.
(b) To issue any order or direction to the respondents which the Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circums
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
