Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, Member (A), M. Swaminathan, Member (J)
R. Pandyane – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and suspension basis. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. 90-day suspension review requirement under ccs(cca) rules. (Para 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. alleged mala fides in criminal case registration. (Para 5) |
| 4. respondents' defense of record tampering and reviews. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. precedents against prolonged suspension without review. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. delay beyond 90 days invalidates suspension. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 7. oa disposed with reinstatement direction. (Para 21) |
ORDER
(Hon'ble Shri. Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, Member(A)
By this Original Application, the applicant is seeking the following relief:-
“(i) Call for the records on the file of the 3rd Respondent relating to the Impugned Suspension Order bearing Ref No. OSD/DE- 1/33-9/SSP(C&I)/2021 dated 16.11.2021 issued by the 3rd Respondent; and the Memorandum bearing Ref. No. OSD/DE-1/33- 9/SSP(C&I)/2021 dated 08.07.2022 issued by the 4th Respondent and the Memorandum bearing Ref. No. OSD/DE-1/33- 9/SSP(C&I)/2021 dated 08.02.2023 issued by the 4th Respondent and to set-aside the same as illegal.
(ii) To reinstate the applicant into service with effect from 16.11.2021 with all service benefits.
(ii
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
