Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, J
Daya Shankar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service as contingency chaukidar with temporary status. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 13 , 16) |
| 2. reliance on precedents for regularization and benefits. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. clause 154 deems qualifying staff as regular employees. (Para 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 17) |
| 4. oa allowed with directions for pension and benefits. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
ORDER
Heard Shri Kamlesh Singh, learned counsel assisted by Shri Shiv Mangal Prajapati, learned counsels for the PUNIT applicant and Shri Vidyapati Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents.
The instant Original Application, Under Section 19 of the Administrative MISHR Tribunals Act, 1985 has been filed by the Applicant for the following A reliefs:-
8. (i). for a direction upon the respondents to treat the services of the applicant as regular for all purposes and release the terminal benefits including Provident Fund, leave encashment etc. forth with along with 18 % penal interest.
8 (ii) Any other relief, which this Hon‟ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case may be given in favour of the applicant.
2. The fact as reflects from the records of the Original Application that the applicant was
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
