Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ajay Pratap Singh, J
Braj Lal Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of misconduct and suspension based on forged documents. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments for and against the validity of suspension. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. judicial reasoning on the appropriateness of the suspension under the rules. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 16) |
| 4. legal principles guiding the authority's decision on suspension. (Para 11 , 18) |
| 5. final dismissal of the application without merit. (Para 20 , 21) |
AS PER : AJAY PRATAP SINGH, MEMBER [JUDICIAL]
1. By way of present OA under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunal, Act 1985 the applicant has claimed following main relief (as extracted from the OA) reads as under:-
“(i) That your Lordships may graciously be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned order of Put-off Duty dated 23.09.2016 as contained in Annexure-A/1 together with subsequent order dated 18.06.2019 as contained in Annexure A/4 both passed by the Respondent No.4.
(ii) That your Lordships may further be pleased to direct/command the Respondents to grant all consequential benefits in favour of the Applicant treating the entire Put-off Duty period as on duty till its revocation for all purposes and the full salary with all benefits minus
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
