Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, Judicial Member, Mohan Pyare, Administrative Member
Satya Deo Ram – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of vigilance raid and charges against applicant. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on enquiry bias and procedural flaws. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. reliance on precedents prohibiting vigilance enquiry officers. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. set aside enquiry for bias and conjectural findings. (Para 12) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Mr. Mohan Pyare, Member (Administrative):
Shri Ashish Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri M.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents are present.
2. By means of this OA, the applicant has sought the following reliefs :
“(i) This Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to quash and set aside impugned penalty order dated 05.01.2017 passed by respondent no.3 and appellate order dated 15.03.2017 passed by the respondent no.2 are marked as Annexure no. I & II to the compilation No.I.
(ii) This Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the respondent to restore the pay of the applicant to its original grade without having any effect of penalty against him.
(iii) Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, may be given in favour of the applicant.
(iv) Award the costs of the original application in favou
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
