Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member
Raja Shekar B. M. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and rejected transfer requests. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents justify transfers via policy and exigencies. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. no discrimination; distinct circumstances for others. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. no right to choice posting; limited judicial interference. (Para 14 , 15) |
ORAL ORDER
(As per Hon’ble Dr. Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member)
By this OA, the applicant sought the following relief:
“……to call for the records pertaining to Proceedings dated 29.12.2023 issued by the 2nd respondent and set the same aside to the extent of transferring the applicant to DD News, Delhi from DDK, Hyderabad and also set-aside the transfer of the party respondent No 4 to DDK, Bangalore from DDK, Shimla by declaring the impugned proceedings dated 29.12.2023 as bad, illegal, arbitrary, irrational, discriminatory. contrary to transfer policy dated 23.09.2021 and unconstitutional and consequently direct the official respondents to post/transfer the applicant to DDK, Bangalore and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
2. The brief facts of the case are that the appl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
