Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, Judicial Member, Mohan Pyare, Administrative Member
Pallavi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of recruitment process and rejection (Para 3) |
| 2. applicant's arguments on experience sufficiency and procedural fairness (Para 5 , 9) |
| 3. respondents' defense on strict document verification requirements (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's scrutiny of certificate genuineness and inadequacy (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. dismissal of application due to non-fulfillment of qualifications (Para 13) |
ORDER
Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Mohan Pyare, Member-(Administrative)
Shri M.K. Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing for the applicant and Shri Jitendra Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the respondents are present.
2. By way of this original application the applicant has sought the following reliefs:-
“(i) Issue a suitable order, writ or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned rejection order dated 15.01.2018 passed by the respondent no.3 (Annexure no. 1).
(ii) Issue a suitable order, writ or direction in the nature of certiorari, directing the respondents to Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to direct the respondents to appoint the applicant on the post of Scientific Assistant (Chemistry) forthwith.
(iii) Issue any other and further writ, order or d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
