Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta Sen, Judicial Member, Sumeet Jerath, Administrative Member
Utpal Saikia – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants' service history and eligibility under 2000 rules (Para 2) |
| 2. delay in promotions due to recruitment rules and violations (Para 3) |
| 3. dpc delays from training dates and deemed abolished posts (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. applicants' claim of arbitrary deprivation of promotion rights (Para 6) |
| 5. summary of facts, cadre review, and training completion (Para 7) |
| 6. right to promotion consideration under articles 14/16 (Para 8) |
| 7. direct dpc for promotion due to departmental inaction (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER
PER SMT. URMITA DATTA SEN, MEMBER (J):
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that since the issue involved in this case is identical one, therefore, applicants’ prayer to join together in a single application may be allowed; and is, therefore, allowed.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the applicants were initially appointed as Sub Inspector (Pioneer) and thereafter promoted as Assistant Engineer Grade II. They are diploma holders in Civil Engineering. As per the applicants, in their entire service career, they have got only one promotion that is from Sub Inspector (Pioneer) to the grade of Assistant Engineer Grade II. It has been further submitted
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
