SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 11522

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K Bhiksham – Appellant
Versus
Dept Of Posts – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

(As per Hon’ble Dr. Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member)

By this Original Application, the applicant is seeking the following relief:

“(a) to call for records pertaining to the issue of impugned order No. F.3/8/2010-S1 dt. 16-3-2011(Annexure-IV) of the 3a Respondent and impugned Order No. C- 14016/10/2007-VP dt. 25-4-2011(Annexure-V) of the 1st Respondent imposing the punishment of withholding of 100% pension admissible to the applicant and forfeiture of the pensionary benefits including gratuity amount on permanent basis, as advised by the 3rd Respondent and set aside the impugned orders dt. 16-3-2011and 25- 4-2011 of the 3rd and 1st Respondents, and declare the same as arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted, misconceived and in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, duly setting aside the punishment imposed on the applicant; and

(b) to direct the Respondents to release the Pension and pensionary benefits as otherwise admissible to the applicant in full with all the consequential benefits, with interest @ 12% p.a. thereon. And be pleased to pass such other and further order or orders as the Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top