Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, Member (A), M. Swaminathan, Member (J)
J.Balasubramanian – Appellant
Versus
Director General, Indian Council of Medical Research – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common issues in oas; relief sought is quashing impugned orders and regularization. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicants' temporary project engagements; no regularization provision in icmr rules. (Para 3) |
| 3. applicants claim discrimination and cite precedents for project staff regularization. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 4. respondents rely on supreme court rulings denying regularization for contractual staff. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 5. prior tribunal order reviewed; impugned order disproves discrimination claims. (Para 10) |
| 6. no vested right to regularization for long-term contractual project employees. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr.Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, Member(A))
Since the issues involved in all the three OAs are common, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order. With the consent of both the parties, OA 1345/2019 shall be treated as the lead case in this matter. In the said OA, the applicant seeks the following relief:
“To call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent in his office proceedings Order No.O.A.591 of 2019/Estt./Legal Cell/2019-20/468 dated 09.09.2019 and quash the same and consequently regularize the service of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
