Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
B.K. Shrivastava, J
Gangu Bai Ramesh Manakar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. oa challenges premature ias transfer order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. ias cadre rule 7 mandates two-year tenure. (Para 3 , 8) |
| 3. respondents justify transfer; csb in abeyance. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 12) |
| 4. 2014 amendment requires csb recommendation for premature transfer. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. high court mandates csb constitution; tenure rule persists. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. transfer based on prima facie administrative complaints. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 7. no hearing needed for non-punitive administrative transfers. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. sufficient material justifies transfer in administrative interest. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 9. oa dismissed; no interference warranted. (Para 23) |
ORDER
PER: JUSTICE B.K. SHRIVASTAVA, MEMBER (J)
This OA has been filed on 08.07.2024 against the order dated 05.07.2024 (Annexure – A3) by which the applicant has been transferred from the post of “Deputy Commissioner, Uttara Kannada District Karwar” to the post of “Chief Editor, Karnataka Gazetteer Department, Bengaluru”. The reliefs claimed in para 8 of the OA are as under:-
“(a) Issue a writ of appropriate nature to set aside the impugned transfer notification e-DPAR 197 SAS 2024 dated 5.7.2024 Annexure – A3 issued by the 3rd
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
