Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ajay Pratap Singh, J
Rakesh Mani – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties and procedural details (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. transfer and disciplinary initiation facts (Para 3 , 4 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. parties' contentions on maintainability (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. framing limitation issue (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. interpretation of at act limitation provisions (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. no condonation without explanation; precedents (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. oa dismissed as time-barred (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
ORDER
PER:- AJAY PRATAP SINGH, MEMBER [JUDICIAL]
1. Heard learned counsel for parties on admission through video conferencing mode.
2. By way of present Original Application filed under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act 1985 (herein after for brevity referred as “A.T. Act, 1985”), applicant has prayed for setting aside order dated 4th August, 2022 issued by Secretary, ICAR in exercise of powers conferred by the President, ICAR vide Council’s order dated 08.02.2008 and appointed under Rule 12 (2) of Central Civil Services (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 (in short Rules 1965) appointed Director, ICAR-Atari as ad-hoc disciplinary authority as the post of Director in the institute is presently held by Acting Director. So also see
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
