SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 11901

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mahesh Ramchandra Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
Employees State Insurance Corporation (esic) – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in not granting increment due to them on completion of one year of service since their last annual increment, the present application has been filed by the applicants under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 are praying for the following reliefs :

“8(a). This Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to call for the records of the case from the Respondents and after examining the same, direct the Respondents to grant one increment to the Applicants on 1st of July of their respective years of retirement with all consequential benefits.

8(b). This Hon’ble Tribunal may further be pleased to direct the Respondents to re-fix the pension and pensionary benefits of the Applicants on account of grant of one increment and to pay them difference of pension and pensionary benefits along with interest @12% per annum.

8(c). Costs of the application be provided for.

8(d). Any other and further order as this Hon’ble Tribunal deems fit in the nature and circumstances of the case be passed.”

3. MA No.637/2024 (Joint Petition) –

This application has been filed by the applic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top