SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 12100

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
N Raghunatha Rao – Appellant
Versus
Aruna Nayar Secy Railway Board New Delhi & Anr – Respondent
C.P./57/2024



CENTRALADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCH, BENGALURU CONTEMPTPETITIONNO.170/00057/2024 IN ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO 189/2023 DATED THIS THE12th DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 CORAM:

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA, MEMBER (J)

HON’BLE DR. SANJIV KUMAR, MEMBER (A)

N.Raghunatha Rao S/oLate Narayana Rao Chavan Aged 63 years Retired Assistant Executive Electrical Engineer Railway Electrifications, S. W. Railway,Bengaluru R/oFlat no. 413,Garuda EstiloHomes Pattalamma Layout, Station Road Kadugodi, Bengaluru-560067. …Petitioner (None present)

Vs.

1. Ms. Aruna Nayar Secretary, Railway Board RoomNo. 227, RailBhawan New Delhi-110001.

2. Sri.Ashok Kumar Verma General manager, Head Quarters office, Central Organisation for Railway Electrification #1, Nawab Yusuf Road, Civil Lines Praygraj, Allahabad-211001. …Respondents (By Shri Vishnu Bhat, Sr. Panel Counsel.)

O R D ER (ORAL)

PER: JUSTICE SSUJATHA, MEMBER (J)

This contempt petition is filed by the petitioner alleging wilful disobedience and breach of the order dated 14.09.2023 passed by this Tribunal in OA No. 189/2023 followed by the order dated 12.02.2024 passed in Miscellaneous Application No. 89/2024 whereby, this Tribunal had directed the respondents to finalize the disciplinary proceedings pending against the applicant/petitioner in an expedite manner within timeframe of five months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order as directed in OA No. 189/2023, further extended by three months vide order dated

12.02.2024in MA No. 89/2024.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has filed the compliance report along with the copy of the order dated 16.07.2024 for having finalized the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner. The said compliance report is taken on record.

3. In view of the aforesaid, no contempt proceedings requires tobe proceeded with.

4. Accordingly, contempt proceedings are dropped. Contempt Petition stands closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the compliance order, if aggrieved.

Notice discharged. Noorder as to costs.

(DR. SANJIV KUMAR) (JUSTICE S. SUJATHA MEMBER (A) MEMBER (J)

/hy/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top