Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
B Anand, Member (A), Rajinder S Dogra, Member (J)
Raj Kumar Katosh – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility for induction into j&k administrative service time scale from feeding services. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. litigation history and tribunal ruling on leave/training reserve vacancies. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. applicants' claim for rba/st slots in 2007 despite provisional induction. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. respondents' defenses of delay, settled seniority, and provisional promotion. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. court summary of facts and acknowledgment of available rba/st slots. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. provisional promotions subject to vacancy allocation; employee not penalized for employer delay. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 7. no delay bar; quash rejection and direct formal placement in reserved slots. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
ORDER
(Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Singh Dogra, Member-J)
1. The present original application is preferred by applicants seeking to challenge the Govt. Order No.123-JK(GAD) of 2022 dated 04-02- 2022, by virtue of which the claim of applicants for issuance of formal order for reflecting their names as ST & RBA category out of total 12 slots available for the year 2007, in the Industries and Commerce Gazetted Service (Functional Manager Ca
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
