Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.G. Sewlikar, Judicial Member, Shri Krishna, Administrative Member
Amol Suresh Gharat – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. termination for suppressing criminal case details (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. probation completion requires notice for termination (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. violation of ccs(ts) rule 5 and avtar singh guidelines (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. willful suppression justifies termination during probation (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. employer must consider post nature and suppression impact (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. criminal case pending only post court cognizance (Para 24 , 25) |
| 7. quash termination without show-cause notice (Para 26 , 27) |
ORDER
Per: Mr. Shri Krishna Member (A)
Aggrieved by the termination of his services for the alleged suppression of facts in his application form regarding pending court cases when he filled up the application form, the applicant has filed this OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act 1985, to claim following reliefs:-
“8.a. This Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to call for the records of the case from the Respondents and after examining the same quash and set aside the order dated 4th September 2019 with all consequential benefits.
b. This Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the Respondents to extend the benefit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
