Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ajay Pratap Singh, J
Smt. Poonam Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on hra payments and applicant's situation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding the applicability of hra rules. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. judicial analysis of hra eligibility based on government accommodation. (Para 11 , 14 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. clarification of the definition of 'same station' under hra rules. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 5. final conclusion on the dismissal of the application. (Para 32 , 34) |
ORDER
PER:- AJAY PRATAP SINGH, MEMBER [JUDICIAL]
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties with consent through video conferencing mode.
PRAYER
2. By way of present Original Application filed under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, applicant has sought the main relief (as extracted from the OA) as under:-
“1. To quash and set aside order passed by the Dy. Commissioner, KVS Regional Office, Ranchi, dated 13.04.2021.
2. The Respondent authority may be ordered/ directed to pay the deducted and recovered amount along with statutory interest within stipulated time period.
3. A heavy amount of cost shall be awarded upon respondents for dereliction of duties, wantonly misinterpretation and ignorance of rules and misusing power and abusing their official position
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
