CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
AJAY PRATAP SINGH, J
Pramod Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary, Railway Board, Ministry of Railway, Government of India – Respondent
ORDER
PER:- AJAY PRATAP SINGH, MEMBER [JUDICIAL]
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties through physical mode.
PRAYER
2. By way of present Original Application filed under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, applicant has sought the main relief (as extracted from the OA) as under:-
“8.1. That your Lordships may graciously be pleased to quash and set aside the order dated 20.082021 as contained in Annexure A/1 issued by Respondent no.5 Patna qua the applicant and respondent no.6.
8.2 That your Lordships may further be pleased to declare the order dated 18.08.2021 as contained in Annexure A/2 issued by Respondent no.5 with respect to seizure of financial power and discontinuation as over all in-charge.
8.3 That your Lordships may further be pleased to direct/command the respondents to allow the applicant to continue as Senior Section Engineer/Elect/G (In-charge), Tata without any disturbance with all consequential benefits.
8.4 Any other relief or reliefs as may deem fit and proper by this Hon’ble Tribunal including the cost of proceeding may be allowed in favour of the applicant.”
FACTS IN BRIEF
3. Briefly stated facts as adumbrated by applicant in the instant OA a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.