Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K. Haripal, Judicial Member
Peer Mohideen S. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. casual labour service history and pension reckoning claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 10 , 12) |
| 2. respondents deny full casual service for pension/macp. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 3. applicant's counsel argues for full service credit. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. 50% casual service counts for pension, excludes interruption. (Para 11 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. casual service not reckoned for macp benefits. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. partial relief for retiral benefits granted. (Para 18) |
ORDER
Applicant is a retired Lascar from the office of the Senior Section Engineer, Works, Nagercoil Junction in Trivandrum Division of Southern Railway. He retired from service on 31.08.2021. According to him, even though he had started his career as Casual Mazdoor on 15.04.1977, when his pension and pensionary benefits were granted, the entire period of service was not reckoned as per law. The qualifying service was taken only for 24.5 years, which is incorrect. According to him, pension should have been granted taking into account 50% of the service, starting from 15.04.1977, when he started his career as a Casual Mazdoor. If that period was also reckoned, he would have service of more than 30 years and would have earned the benefit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
