Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shri Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, J, Shri Pramod Kumar Das, A
Ashiquzzaman – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the applicant's service history and promotion denial. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural adherence by dpc in the applicant's promotion case. (Para 4) |
| 3. the ratio decidendi concerning the legality of dpc procedures involving sealed cover. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. court's observations on the inadequacy of dpc handling and necessity for review. (Para 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. conclusion on the need for re-evaluation of the applicant's promotion eligibility. (Para 12) |
ORDER
PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A):
The facts of the matter are that the applicant is a Direct Recruit Office of Indian Customs and Central Excise Service of 2009 batch. He joined the service in 2009 as Assistant Commissioner. Thereafter, in April, 2014 he was promoted to the post of Dy. Commissioner. He was placed under suspension in contemplation of disciplinary proceedings vide order dated 25.10.2018. The order of suspension was revoked w.e.f. 22.07.2019 vide order dated 08.03.2021.
2. According to the applicant he was due for promotion to Joint Commissioner when his batchmates (2009) were promoted to Joint Commissioner w.e.f. 01.01.2019, 01.01.2020 (2010 batch), and 01.01.2021 (2011 batch) but he could n
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
