Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Justice Om Prakash VII, J
Rahul Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Communication – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant seeks to quash termination notice. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural irregularities in termination. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. responses cite merit-based evaluation and procedural adherence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's reasoning on reviewing authority and applicant's merited position. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. judgment highlights the importance of due procedure in appointment. (Para 15 , 18) |
| 6. counterarguments by respondents concerning applicant's eligibility. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. court examines complaints and procedural validity. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. final analysis and evaluation of procedural correctness in review. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 9. further investigation of the rules pertaining to review. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 10. court concludes on legality of reviewing authority's actions. (Para 34 , 36 , 37) |
| 11. final order dismissing the original application. (Para 38) |
ORDER
(Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (J)
Shri Avnish Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri M.P. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents, were present at the time of hearing.
2. The instant original application has been filed by the applicant seeking fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
