Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, J, Sangam Narain Srivastava, A
M. Revathi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. history of disciplinary proceedings and prior court orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. applicant's contentions on delay and impermissible supersession. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. respondents' defense of ltc misconduct and procedural compliance. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court review of facts, prior judgments, and non-compliance. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. belated charge memo quashed; retirement benefits directed. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
Both these applications have been filed by one M. Revathi. In the OA No. 1400 of 2015, the applicant has prayed for the following relief:
“To call for the records relating to the disciplinary proceedings pending against the applicant pursuant nd to the charge memo issued by the 2 respondent in ref SMR/ESTT/CEM/390, dated 13.10.1999 and quash the same and grant all consequential benefits to the applicant”
2. In the OA No.547 of 2022, the relief sought for is as follows:
“To call for the records relating to the impugned st charge memo issued by the 1 respondent in No.34(2)(8)/2022-CCO, dated 27.05.2022, and quash the same and direct the respondents to permit the applicant to retire fro
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
