Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, Sangam Narain Srivastava, Administrative Member
R.Gopalakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants' service history as commission bearers (Para 2) |
| 2. respondents deny pension credit for pre-absorption service (Para 3) |
| 3. applicants rely on supreme court precedents (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. applicants identically placed to successful litigants (Para 6) |
| 5. supreme court mandates parity across railway zones (Para 7) |
| 6. supreme court prevails; quash rejection order (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Member(J))
The applicant has filed the present OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following relief:
"To call for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the 3rd Respondent bearing No.P(S)353/III/SCB/OA 142/2015 dated 13.03.2017 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to count the service of the applicants from their initial engagement as temporary vendors for the purpose of reckoning the total service for the calculation of retiral benefits namely, Gratuity and Pension within a time frame and pass such other order or direction as this Hon. Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice."
2. The brief facts of the case as stated by the appl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
