Arepalli Venkateswara Rao, Sanga Prabhakar Rao, I.Sudhakar, Chirakala Subba Rao, Khaja Manzoor Ahmad Siddiqui, M Nataraj Mudali, B Krishna Rao, M.Radha Rani, C. Bala Krishna, Mamidi Krishna Murthy, G Sugunakar vs Union of India, The Regional Director, Regional Directorate of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 13347

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Dr. Lata Baswaraj Patne, Ms. Shalini Misra, JJ
Arepalli Venkateswara Rao, Sanga Prabhakar Rao, I.Sudhakar, Chirakala Subba Rao, Khaja Manzoor Ahmad Siddiqui, M Nataraj Mudali, B Krishna Rao, M.Radha Rani, C. Bala Krishna, Mamidi Krishna Murthy, G Sugunakar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, The Regional Director, Regional Directorate of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. K. Siva Reddy, Mrs. Anita Swain, Mrs. Megha Rani Agarwal, Mrs. B. Gayatri Varma, Sr.CGSC, Mrs. K. Rajitha, Sr. PC for CG, Mr. D. Satyaveer, Sr. PC for CG, Mr. A. Surender Reddy, Sr. PC for CG, Mrs. N. Naga Prasanthi, Addl. CGSC, Mr. P. Krishna, Sr. PC for CG, Mrs. M. Venkata Swamy, Sr. PC for CG, Mr. B. Rajeshwar Rao, Sr. PC for CG, Mr. M. Brahma Reddy, Sr. PC for CG, Mr. P. Naveen Kumar, Addl. CGSC, Mr. V. Venu Madhava Swamy, Sr. PC for CG, Mr. P. Narayana, Sr. PC for CG
For the Respondents: Mrs. B. Gayatri Varma, Sr.CGSC, Mrs. K. Rajitha, Sr. PC for CG, Mrs. Megha Rani Agarwal, Sr. PC for CG

ORAL ORDER

(As per Hon’ble Dr. Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member)

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. By these Original Applications, applicants are praying for similar relief viz., seeking a direction to the Respondents to grant one notional increment from 1^st July / 1^st January, as the case may be, for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits with all other consequential benefits.

3. Since the issue involved in all these OAs is common by consent of the both sides, matters have been taken up for consideration at the admission stage.

4. In some of the matters, though notices were ordered, however, considering the order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 06.09.2024 in Miscellaneous Application Diary No.2400/2024 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.4722/2021, titled as Union of India and another vs. M. Siddaraj along with other IA No. 11504/2024 & batch, these OAs have been taken up for adjudication.

5. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the issue involved in these matters is squarely covered by the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in the matter of M. Siddaraj and C.P. Mundinamani and others. Hence, all these applicants in these OAs, who have reti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document