SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 13404

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member, Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member
Mohd Arshad – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
Original Application No. 61/1170/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ankesh Chandel
For the Respondents: Mr. Hunar Gupta, learned D.A.G., Mr. Sudesh Magotra, learned A.A.G.

Qualifications from de-recognized institutes valid if obtained by candidates admitted during recognition period; subsequent de-recognition cannot invalidate selection, per equity and government policy allowing verification.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Service law - Selection for post of technician - Qualification from out-of-state institute recognized at time of admission - Subsequent de-recognition of institute during course - Selection initially withheld subject to verification, later cancelled relying on government order stating diplomas beyond 2016 invalid - Clarifications from paramedical council and health department confirming genuineness and admission during valid recognition period (NOC w.e.f. 18.01.2016 for one year till 17.01.2017; admission on 03.01.2017) - Government order providing for recognition of diplomas of students admitted during affiliation period after verification - Supreme Court precedent holding it unjust to deny benefit of recognition existing at admission time despite later de-recognition - Cancellation order quashed; appointment directed within eight weeks. (Paras 16, 17, 18, 19, 20)

(B) Government orders on recognition - Diplomas from de-recognized out-of-state institutions - Valid if student admitted during affiliation period and verified genuine - No fault attributable to candidate joining recognized course before de-recognition. (Paras 9, 10, 18)

Facts of the case:
Applicant selected as sole candidate for technician post under advertisement requiring diploma from recognized institute and specialized training - Recommendation withheld for verification of out-of-state institute's recognition - Despite clarifications confirming admission during valid NOC period and genuineness, selection cancelled citing government order on post-2016 invalidity.

Findings of Court:
Impugned cancellation order set aside; respondents directed to appoint applicant to post within eight weeks. Original application allowed; no costs.

Issues: Validity of selection cancellation despite admission to recognized course before de-recognition; applicability of government orders permitting verification of diplomas from affiliation period; equity in recognizing qualifications obtained under subsisting recognition.

Ratio Decidendi: Certificates from institute recognized at admission time cannot be invalidated by subsequent de-recognition; government policy protects students admitted during valid period post-verification; cancellation arbitrary and contrary to clarifications and precedent.

Result: Original Application allowed.

Table of Content
1. advertisement, selection process, and qualifications for ecg technician post. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 12 , 13)
2. withholding and cancellation of applicant's selection despite qualifications. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 11)
3. verification confirming institute recognition at admission time. (Para 7 , 8 , 16)
4. government orders validate diplomas from recognized period. (Para 9 , 10 , 17 , 18)
5. supreme court precedent protects students admitted pre-de-recognition. (Para 14 , 19 , 20)
6. quashing cancellation and directing appointment. (Para 15 , 21 , 22)

ORDER

(Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Singh Dogra)

The present Original Application has been filed by the applicant under Section-19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 making therein the following prayer: -

“i. Quash the order No. 306 SSB of 2020 dated 27.11.2020 issued by the respondent No. 2 by virtue of which the selection of the applicant as ECG Technician in GMC Kathua was cancelled ab initio.

ii. Directing the respondent No. 1 and 2 to appoint the applicant as ECG Technician for GMC Kathua, Divisional Cadre Jammu against the open merit category as the applicant was the only candidate, who stood selected against the only post of ECG Technician in pursuant to Advertisement Notice No. 05 of 2019 dated 01.02.2019 in the light of the clarification issued by the J&K Paramedical Council Jammu and Health and Medical Education Department, Jammu.”

2. The brief facts of the case leading to filing of this O.A. are: -

That the advertisement came to be issued by the J&K Service Selection Board vide No. 05 of 2019 dated 01.02.2019 for various posts in GMC Kathua, Divisional Cadre Jammu and the total number of posts advertised were 247. It is further submitted that through the medium of the aforesaid advertisement online applications were invited from eligible candidates for participating in the selection process for Divisional Cadre posts mentioned in Annexure-A to the notification. In clause-iii of the aforesaid advertisement notice it was specifically mentioned that the candidates will be eligible, who are in possession of the prescribed academic/professional/technical qualification as shown in Annexure-A by or before the last date of submission of the application forms i.e. 27.02.2019. It is worthwhile to mention as per Annexure-A to the aforesaid advertisement notice the qualification for the post of ECG Technician was 10+2 with science or above qualification with Diploma in X-Ray Assistant/Technician from any recognized Institute with three months specialized training in ECG from any recognized Institute/SMF. The applicant submitted his application form and applied against the post of ECG Technician strictly in conformity with the terms and conditions of advertisement notice before the cut of date and possessed the requisite qualification in terms of the advertisement dated 01.02.2019.

3. The applicant stood selected in open merit category by securing 23.25 marks for the post of ECG Technician for GMC Kathua and the applicant was the only candidate, who stood selected in open merit category against the only post of ECG Technician which is evident from the bare perusal of the select list issued by the respondent No. 2. Copy of the selection list is annexed herewith as Annexure-A3.

4. Since the applicant was the only candidate, who stood selected for the post of ECG Technician it was incumbent on part of the respondent No. 1 to have appointed the applicant, but the respondents without any justifiable cause withheld the appointment of the applicant as the recommendation of SSRB was subject to verification/recognition status of Diploma/institute by the indenting department.

5. The applicant produced all the requisite documents before the respondent No. 1 and 2, but the respondents without any justifiable cause withheld the appointment of the applicant. The applicant places on record all the requisite documents i.e. certificate issued by the Institute of Public Health and Hygiene for c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top