Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.G. Sewlikar, J, Santosh Mehra, A
Sudhakar Narayan Nar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties and case details listed. (Para 1) |
| 2. applicants 4 and 20 withdraw claims. (Para 2) |
| 3. applicants claim notional increment per sc judgment. (Para 3) |
| 4. sc rules employees entitled to increment earned before retirement. (Para 4) |
| 5. applicants entitled to notional increment; respondents cite clarifying order. (Para 5) |
| 6. notional increment from july 2023, no arrears. (Para 6) |
| 7. application allowed, increment granted prospectively. (Para 7) |
ORDER (Oral)
By Justice M.G. Sewlikar, Member (J)
We have heard learned counsel for the appli- cants and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants at serial no. 4 and 20 do not press the applica- tion as they have got the benefit of one notional increment. Their application, therefore, stand withdrawn.
3. The applicants are claiming notional increment on the basis of the judgement of the Supreme Court in the case of The Director (Admn. And HR) KPTCL & Ors. Vs. C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. in Civil Appeal No.2471 of 2023 decided on 11th April, 2023.
4. In the case of The Director (Admn. And HR) KPTCL & Ors. Vs. C.P. Mundinamani (supra), Supreme Court has directed the Central Governme
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
